[Discuss] Favorite OSHW Linux computers?

[Drew Fustini]

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Nathan Seidle <nathan at sparkfun.com> wrote:

> We should encourage them to include a license on the files for clarity's
> sake, not because it's a requirement to claim OSHW
>

That is an interesting point that you raise and I think it makes sense.

But I am now confused about design files released under a license with a
Non-Commercial clause like CC NC.   I bought a Printrbot Simple last year,
and I was dissappointed to discover it's design files have the CC NC
clause.  My understanding is this meant the product failed to meet the OSHW
definition.

However, I am now wondering if this is correct.  If design files with no
license are considered OSHW, then does it makes sense to regard design
files with a NC license as not being OSHW?

thanks,
drew
http://keybase.io/pdp7
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.oshwa.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20150206/70ad672c/attachment.html>