[Discuss] "open spec": an ambiguous term?

alicia amgibb at gmail.com
Wed May 28 04:01:21 UTC 2014

Hmmm that's interesting. I haven't heard the term used outside of this


On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Drew Fustini <pdp7pdp7 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Linux.com and LinuxGizmos recently did a survey of top single board
> computers (SBCs):
> http://www.linux.com/news/embedded-mobile/mobile-linux/773852-top-10-open-source-linux-and-android-sbcs
> http://linuxgizmos.com/top-10-hacker-sbcs-survey-results/
> Interesting crop of boards and results, but the term "open spec" is
> used as the qualifier.  If "open spec" implies that information needed
> to reproduce the board is available, then the 1st place SBC in the
> results would be disqualified (no Board Layout, no Bill Of Materials).
>  If not, then I'm confused by what exactly they mean by the term.
> I see the "open spec" term used again here:
> http://linuxgizmos.com/open-spec-com-features-quad-core-rockchip/
> So I wanted to get the opinion of the list if:
> is "open spec" a common term?
> does its usage dilute the meaning of "open source hardware"?
> thanks,
> drew
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.oshwa.org
> http://lists.oshwa.org/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.oshwa.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140527/5faeb7d1/attachment.html>

More information about the discuss mailing list