[Discuss] "open spec": an ambiguous term?
amgibb at gmail.com
Wed May 28 04:01:21 UTC 2014
Hmmm that's interesting. I haven't heard the term used outside of this
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Drew Fustini <pdp7pdp7 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Linux.com and LinuxGizmos recently did a survey of top single board
> computers (SBCs):
> Interesting crop of boards and results, but the term "open spec" is
> used as the qualifier. If "open spec" implies that information needed
> to reproduce the board is available, then the 1st place SBC in the
> results would be disqualified (no Board Layout, no Bill Of Materials).
> If not, then I'm confused by what exactly they mean by the term.
> I see the "open spec" term used again here:
> So I wanted to get the opinion of the list if:
> is "open spec" a common term?
> does its usage dilute the meaning of "open source hardware"?
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.oshwa.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss