[Discuss] discuss Digest, Vol 24, Issue 13

Jerry Shi jerry.shi at iteadstudio.com
Wed May 14 01:20:02 UTC 2014


unsubscribe


-- 
Jerry Shi
Itead Studio


On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 at 1:04 AM, discuss-request at lists.oshwa.org wrote:

> Send discuss mailing list submissions to
> discuss at lists.oshwa.org (mailto:discuss at lists.oshwa.org)
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.oshwa.org/listinfo/discuss
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> discuss-request at lists.oshwa.org (mailto:discuss-request at lists.oshwa.org)
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> discuss-owner at lists.oshwa.org (mailto:discuss-owner at lists.oshwa.org)
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of discuss digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
> 1. 3D printing patents (Matt Maier)
> 2. 3D printing patents (Matt Maier)
> 3. Re: 3D printing patents (gabriella levine)
> 4. Re: 3D printing patents (gabriella levine)
> 5. Re: 3D printing patents (Robert Cornell)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 10:28:58 -0600
> From: Matt Maier <blueback09 at gmail.com (mailto:blueback09 at gmail.com)>
> To: Open Manufacturing <openmanufacturing at googlegroups.com (mailto:openmanufacturing at googlegroups.com)>, The Open
> Source Hardware Association Discussion List <discuss at lists.oshwa.org (mailto:discuss at lists.oshwa.org)>
> Subject: [Discuss] 3D printing patents
> Message-ID:
> <CA+S82DpHv7fWz+NE=MnaBai7D0N6_AndCA_ZtCyrCDsKze+NAA at mail.gmail.com (mailto:MnaBai7D0N6_AndCA_ZtCyrCDsKze+NAA at mail.gmail.com)>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> What do y'all think about this?
> 
> http://3dprint.com/3187/makerbot-3d-printer-invention/
> 
> *"Makerbot has invented a new type of process which, if it works properly,
> will allow 3D printers to change build material mid print. They have filed
> a patent to protect this solution over a year and a half ago, but just
> recently was it published for the public to see, and 3DPrint.com (http://3DPrint.com) has
> uncovered it."*
> *"The multiple materials would be fed into their individual feeds, which
> are connected to a filament changer (or build material changer). The
> filament changer would be able to slide the extrusion head from material to
> material, in a fluent motion. It would also consist of a blade or other
> cutting edge, that would cut the 1st material before proceeding to the
> second"*
> *"It covers them for other types of print processes other than FDM, and
> also allows for two separate extruders to be alternately positioned along
> the tool path for a similar effect..."*
> 
> It seems like this patent is exactly the sort of thing the community has
> been discussing. Did Makerbot really invent this, or are they trying to
> patent something that the open source community developed first? Is this an
> example of the sort of thing we'd want to respond to in a structured way,
> like doing the prior art search on behalf of the USPTO and pushing the
> results to them?
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.oshwa.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140513/a4ff4ac1/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 10:28:58 -0600
> From: Matt Maier <blueback09 at gmail.com (mailto:blueback09 at gmail.com)>
> To: Open Manufacturing <openmanufacturing at googlegroups.com (mailto:openmanufacturing at googlegroups.com)>, The Open
> Source Hardware Association Discussion List <discuss at lists.oshwa.org (mailto:discuss at lists.oshwa.org)>
> Subject: [Discuss] 3D printing patents
> Message-ID:
> <CA+S82DpHv7fWz+NE=MnaBai7D0N6_AndCA_ZtCyrCDsKze+NAA at mail.gmail.com (mailto:MnaBai7D0N6_AndCA_ZtCyrCDsKze+NAA at mail.gmail.com)>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> What do y'all think about this?
> 
> http://3dprint.com/3187/makerbot-3d-printer-invention/
> 
> *"Makerbot has invented a new type of process which, if it works properly,
> will allow 3D printers to change build material mid print. They have filed
> a patent to protect this solution over a year and a half ago, but just
> recently was it published for the public to see, and 3DPrint.com (http://3DPrint.com) has
> uncovered it."*
> *"The multiple materials would be fed into their individual feeds, which
> are connected to a filament changer (or build material changer). The
> filament changer would be able to slide the extrusion head from material to
> material, in a fluent motion. It would also consist of a blade or other
> cutting edge, that would cut the 1st material before proceeding to the
> second"*
> *"It covers them for other types of print processes other than FDM, and
> also allows for two separate extruders to be alternately positioned along
> the tool path for a similar effect..."*
> 
> It seems like this patent is exactly the sort of thing the community has
> been discussing. Did Makerbot really invent this, or are they trying to
> patent something that the open source community developed first? Is this an
> example of the sort of thing we'd want to respond to in a structured way,
> like doing the prior art search on behalf of the USPTO and pushing the
> results to them?
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.oshwa.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140513/a4ff4ac1/attachment-0002.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 09:48:18 -0700
> From: gabriella levine <gabriella.levine at gmail.com (mailto:gabriella.levine at gmail.com)>
> To: The Open Source Hardware Association Discussion List
> <discuss at lists.oshwa.org (mailto:discuss at lists.oshwa.org)>
> Cc: Open Manufacturing <openmanufacturing at googlegroups.com (mailto:openmanufacturing at googlegroups.com)>
> Subject: Re: [Discuss] 3D printing patents
> Message-ID:
> <CA+kC6d3FaPS-qoBU76kzmyyPtWabvMPx8=cGB_XfFgJnAQfE+g at mail.gmail.com (mailto:cGB_XfFgJnAQfE+g at mail.gmail.com)>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> That sounds totally spot on, from my understanding "Did Makerbot really
> invent this, or are they trying to patent something that the open source
> community developed first? ".
> 
> From my understanding, as a start, would be find documentation of such
> processes in the public domain, documented by the open source community or
> elsewhere ...
> 
> But i'm looking forward to hearing what others respond.
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Matt Maier <blueback09 at gmail.com (mailto:blueback09 at gmail.com)> wrote:
> 
> > What do y'all think about this?
> > 
> > http://3dprint.com/3187/makerbot-3d-printer-invention/
> > 
> > *"Makerbot has invented a new type of process which, if it works properly,
> > will allow 3D printers to change build material mid print. They have filed
> > a patent to protect this solution over a year and a half ago, but just
> > recently was it published for the public to see, and 3DPrint.com (http://3DPrint.com) has
> > uncovered it."*
> > *"The multiple materials would be fed into their individual feeds, which
> > are connected to a filament changer (or build material changer). The
> > filament changer would be able to slide the extrusion head from material to
> > material, in a fluent motion. It would also consist of a blade or other
> > cutting edge, that would cut the 1st material before proceeding to the
> > second"*
> > *"It covers them for other types of print processes other than FDM, and
> > also allows for two separate extruders to be alternately positioned along
> > the tool path for a similar effect..."*
> > 
> > It seems like this patent is exactly the sort of thing the community has
> > been discussing. Did Makerbot really invent this, or are they trying to
> > patent something that the open source community developed first? Is this an
> > example of the sort of thing we'd want to respond to in a structured way,
> > like doing the prior art search on behalf of the USPTO and pushing the
> > results to them?
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > discuss mailing list
> > discuss at lists.oshwa.org (mailto:discuss at lists.oshwa.org)
> > http://lists.oshwa.org/listinfo/discuss
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ----------*RECENT & UPCOMING*-----------------------
> ---------------------------------
> Floating Point <http://floating.pt>
> portfolio <http://gabriellalevine.com>
> Blog <http://www.levinegabriella.com/category/ongoing/>
> sneel.co (http://sneel.co)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------
> skype: gabriellalevine
> m: +19177254217 (int'l)
> m: +19177340587 (US)
> twitter <http://twitter.com/gabriella_sneel> *vimeo
> <http://twitter.com/gabriella_sneel> **fb
> <http://flickr.com/gabriellalevine> *github <http://github.com/gabriella>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.oshwa.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140513/b257171e/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 09:48:18 -0700
> From: gabriella levine <gabriella.levine at gmail.com (mailto:gabriella.levine at gmail.com)>
> To: The Open Source Hardware Association Discussion List
> <discuss at lists.oshwa.org (mailto:discuss at lists.oshwa.org)>
> Cc: Open Manufacturing <openmanufacturing at googlegroups.com (mailto:openmanufacturing at googlegroups.com)>
> Subject: Re: [Discuss] 3D printing patents
> Message-ID:
> <CA+kC6d3FaPS-qoBU76kzmyyPtWabvMPx8=cGB_XfFgJnAQfE+g at mail.gmail.com (mailto:cGB_XfFgJnAQfE+g at mail.gmail.com)>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> That sounds totally spot on, from my understanding "Did Makerbot really
> invent this, or are they trying to patent something that the open source
> community developed first? ".
> 
> From my understanding, as a start, would be find documentation of such
> processes in the public domain, documented by the open source community or
> elsewhere ...
> 
> But i'm looking forward to hearing what others respond.
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Matt Maier <blueback09 at gmail.com (mailto:blueback09 at gmail.com)> wrote:
> 
> > What do y'all think about this?
> > 
> > http://3dprint.com/3187/makerbot-3d-printer-invention/
> > 
> > *"Makerbot has invented a new type of process which, if it works properly,
> > will allow 3D printers to change build material mid print. They have filed
> > a patent to protect this solution over a year and a half ago, but just
> > recently was it published for the public to see, and 3DPrint.com (http://3DPrint.com) has
> > uncovered it."*
> > *"The multiple materials would be fed into their individual feeds, which
> > are connected to a filament changer (or build material changer). The
> > filament changer would be able to slide the extrusion head from material to
> > material, in a fluent motion. It would also consist of a blade or other
> > cutting edge, that would cut the 1st material before proceeding to the
> > second"*
> > *"It covers them for other types of print processes other than FDM, and
> > also allows for two separate extruders to be alternately positioned along
> > the tool path for a similar effect..."*
> > 
> > It seems like this patent is exactly the sort of thing the community has
> > been discussing. Did Makerbot really invent this, or are they trying to
> > patent something that the open source community developed first? Is this an
> > example of the sort of thing we'd want to respond to in a structured way,
> > like doing the prior art search on behalf of the USPTO and pushing the
> > results to them?
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > discuss mailing list
> > discuss at lists.oshwa.org (mailto:discuss at lists.oshwa.org)
> > http://lists.oshwa.org/listinfo/discuss
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ----------*RECENT & UPCOMING*-----------------------
> ---------------------------------
> Floating Point <http://floating.pt>
> portfolio <http://gabriellalevine.com>
> Blog <http://www.levinegabriella.com/category/ongoing/>
> sneel.co (http://sneel.co)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------
> skype: gabriellalevine
> m: +19177254217 (int'l)
> m: +19177340587 (US)
> twitter <http://twitter.com/gabriella_sneel> *vimeo
> <http://twitter.com/gabriella_sneel> **fb
> <http://flickr.com/gabriellalevine> *github <http://github.com/gabriella>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.oshwa.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140513/b257171e/attachment-0002.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 17:50:47 +0100
> From: Robert Cornell <bobnet604 at gmail.com (mailto:bobnet604 at gmail.com)>
> To: The Open Source Hardware Association Discussion List
> <discuss at lists.oshwa.org (mailto:discuss at lists.oshwa.org)>
> Subject: Re: [Discuss] 3D printing patents
> Message-ID:
> <CAE1FtYe_MDg6_35Pdh0324vMmRGfGLYquaYqQMP2M9r-0OVtqA at mail.gmail.com (mailto:CAE1FtYe_MDg6_35Pdh0324vMmRGfGLYquaYqQMP2M9r-0OVtqA at mail.gmail.com)>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Hello,
> 
> RepRapPro have a blog post
> https://reprappro.com/2014/04/15/multimaterial-research/ and I've been
> playing with the idea.
> It's a better method that would make the patent mentioned irrelevant.
> 
> When Stratasys took over MakerBot and they closed their design there was a
> lot of discussion about how they cashed out
> on open source efforts. I suppose something like this was inevitable.
> 
> I can't recall seeing this exact method before so maybe they did 'invent'
> it. I'm going to read the patent and dig into the archives.
> 
> Rob
> --
> openpart.co.uk (http://openpart.co.uk)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 13 May 2014 17:28, Matt Maier <blueback09 at gmail.com (mailto:blueback09 at gmail.com)> wrote:
> 
> > What do y'all think about this?
> > 
> > http://3dprint.com/3187/makerbot-3d-printer-invention/
> > 
> > *"Makerbot has invented a new type of process which, if it works properly,
> > will allow 3D printers to change build material mid print. They have filed
> > a patent to protect this solution over a year and a half ago, but just
> > recently was it published for the public to see, and 3DPrint.com (http://3DPrint.com) has
> > uncovered it."*
> > *"The multiple materials would be fed into their individual feeds, which
> > are connected to a filament changer (or build material changer). The
> > filament changer would be able to slide the extrusion head from material to
> > material, in a fluent motion. It would also consist of a blade or other
> > cutting edge, that would cut the 1st material before proceeding to the
> > second"*
> > *"It covers them for other types of print processes other than FDM, and
> > also allows for two separate extruders to be alternately positioned along
> > the tool path for a similar effect..."*
> > 
> > It seems like this patent is exactly the sort of thing the community has
> > been discussing. Did Makerbot really invent this, or are they trying to
> > patent something that the open source community developed first? Is this an
> > example of the sort of thing we'd want to respond to in a structured way,
> > like doing the prior art search on behalf of the USPTO and pushing the
> > results to them?
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > discuss mailing list
> > discuss at lists.oshwa.org (mailto:discuss at lists.oshwa.org)
> > http://lists.oshwa.org/listinfo/discuss
> > 
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.oshwa.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140513/aa7f3e14/attachment.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.oshwa.org (mailto:discuss at lists.oshwa.org)
> http://lists.oshwa.org/listinfo/discuss
> 
> 
> End of discuss Digest, Vol 24, Issue 13
> ***************************************
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.oshwa.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140514/83341377/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the discuss mailing list