[Discuss] discuss Digest, Vol 10, Issue 92
contact at marketply.org
Sat Mar 23 00:27:27 UTC 2013
The (3) had seemed to mean to me an option for "meh", although I selected it
mostly when either unsure and other times when it seemed "meh".
I really love what you're planning though, helping people make sense of the info
chaos in open hardware would be a leap in a great direction! We'll definitely be
networking with your project and contributing.
> On March 22, 2013 at 8:00 PM Matt Maier <blueback09 at gmail.com> wrote:
> That's exactly the kind of feedback I need! Since I wrote it, of course I
> know what it's supposed to be, but I don't know how other people will
> interpret things at first glance.
> I was intending for the (3) to be the Don't Know/Not Sure answer since it's
> right in between (1) and (5). Thanks for pointing out that it's unclear.
> > > ------------------------------
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 06:31:06 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: Marketply < contact at marketply.org <mailto:contact at marketply.org> >
> > To: The Open Source Hardware Association Discussion List
> > < discuss at lists.oshwa.org <mailto:discuss at lists.oshwa.org> >
> > Subject: Re: [Discuss] open hardware documentation survey
> > Message-ID:
> > < 424995844.111221.1363948266519.open-xchange at email.1and1.com
> > <mailto:424995844.111221.1363948266519.open-xchange at email.1and1.com> >
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> > Your survey is really thorough! I thought it was going to be mostly about
> > personal questions, so maybe you should push them to the back to prevent
> > people
> > from jumping to conclusions about the rest of the survey.
> > I wrote suggestions on some of the pages, one in particular is the survey
> > needs
> > an option for "not sure". Because you're forced to choose an answer even
> > if you
> > don't understand the question.
> > Best,
> > ~Marino
> > >
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss