[Discuss] Open and Closed

Tom Igoe tom.igoe at gmail.com
Sun Mar 17 22:23:08 UTC 2013

I find him insufferable,  but he does have a point. There are a lot of lazy uses of the term "open" floating around. Makes me glad for the effort on the definition.


On Mar 16, 2013, at 6:57 PM, Catarina Mota wrote:

> Provocative, not very well grounded, but interesting nevertheless - and related to the discussion we've been having about what it means to label something as "open source."
> http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/17/opinion/sunday/morozov-open-and-closed.html
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.oshwa.org
> http://lists.oshwa.org/listinfo/discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.oshwa.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130317/9a6f6d0e/attachment.html>

More information about the discuss mailing list