[Discuss] Open Hardware defintion and eagle files
jamesmikedupont at googlemail.com
Fri Sep 14 14:12:50 UTC 2012
Well, for OSHW to be credible it needs to be clear.
How about a OSHW disclosure process, I felt misled and I am sure more
will be in the future.
lets make a range of licenses like CC has and make it clear what they mean.
you can call OSHW v1 the core license and then add in more "freedoms"
if you want to make it look like a feature and not a bug.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Bryan Bishop <kanzure at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Mike Dupont wrote:
>> I am willing to help with this process if there is interest , maybe
>> for the next version of the license.
> I am not exactly sure what the incentives are for people to
> voluntarily mark their product as non-open-source, in this case.
> You're saying you will offer help with this next version, but who
> exactly would be willing to go from "open source" to "oops, we were
> wrong" ? :-)
> - Bryan
> 1 512 203 0507
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
Saving wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com
Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world http://fosm.org
Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3
More information about the discuss