[Discuss] A guide to open source hardware

[Jay Patel]

is OpenBSD more compatible with OSHWA project?


On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Matt Maier <blueback09 at gmail.com> wrote:

> In terms of a structured way to capture all of the documentation you
> describe, this is a process I demonstrated a while back for Open Source
> Ecology's LifeTrac tractor http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/
> Distributed_Collaboration
>
> I'm working on a better way http://github.howstr.com/
>
> Your write up is pretty good. You should add a section about keeping the
> documentation up to date as the project evolves. It also kind of highlights
> the reason open source hardware documentation is so scant...it's a lot of
> work and it's not clear to many what they get back for doing all that work.
>
> We need to make it easier, so that it's not so much work.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Bonvoisin, Jeremy <
> jeremy.bonvoisin at tu-berlin.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I’m a researcher at the Technical University Berlin where we have a newly
>> started French-German research project on open source hardware
>> <http://130.149.46.183/wiki/index.php/OPEN!_Methods_and_tools_for_community-based_product_development>.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I would like to share with you a document we made to summarize the best
>> practices we observed through the analysis of a large number of open source
>> hardware projects. The page is named “a guide to open source hardware
>> <http://130.149.46.183/wiki/index.php/A_guide_to_Open_Source_Hardware>”
>> and attempts giving practical guidance regarding documentation of open
>> source hardware products, especially for mechanic products. This is some
>> sort of extension of the “Best Practices of Open Source Hardware 1.0
>> <http://www.oshwa.org/sharing-best-practices/>” of the OSHWA.
>>
>>
>>
>> I would be glad to get your impressions, feedback, critics or even
>> propositions for further development of this document.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am also open for merging this document with existing initiatives, for
>> example if there are discussions about a second version of the “best
>> practices” of the OSHWA.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your reactions!
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Jérémy Bonvoisin
>>
>>
>>
>> Dr. Jérémy Bonvoisin
>>
>> Ingénieur esiea – Research engineer
>>
>> Institut für Werkzeugmaschinen und Fabrikbetrieb - IWF
>>
>> Fachgebiet Industrielle Informationstechnik
>>
>> Technische Universität Berlin
>>
>> Mail: jeremy.bonvoisin at tu-berlin.de
>>
>> Tel.: +49 (0)30 39006 358
>>
>> Raum: PTZ 563
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss at lists.oshwa.org
>> http://lists.oshwa.org/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.oshwa.org
> http://lists.oshwa.org/listinfo/discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.oshwa.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20160817/6879dc58/attachment-0001.html>