[Discuss] (no subject)

Emilio Velis contacto at emiliovelis.com
Wed Sep 9 21:40:14 UTC 2015

Well, In my opinion, that would depend on whether you see the hardware as
copyrightable (in some cases it is). Otherwise, copyright should only
protect the expression of the piece of hardware, and that should be

Thoughts, anyone?

On 9 September 2015 at 14:15, Drew Fustini <pdp7pdp7 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I was just reading this thread on the arm-netbook mailing list:
>   [Arm-netbook] How much to design A20 board?
> http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/pipermail/arm-netbook/2015-September/010660.html
> and came across this viewpoint:
>   "attribution clauses require you to advertise *on the product*."
> I've never considered that before.  Anyone have thoughts about if the
> physical piece of hardware based on CC-BY-SA designs needs to have
> attribution inscribed on it?
> thanks,
> drew
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.oshwa.org
> http://lists.oshwa.org/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.oshwa.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20150909/925be966/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the discuss mailing list