[Discuss] Attribution on physical hardware?

[Ben Gray]

I've always taken Adafruit's text as that (for example)

"PCB files for the Adafruit Particle/Spark Neopixel Ring

For more details, check out the product page at

   - https://www.adafruit.com/product/2268

Adafruit invests time and resources providing this open source design,
please support Adafruit and open-source hardware by purchasing products
from Adafruit!

Designed by Adafruit Industries. Creative Commons Attribution, Share-Alike
license, check license.txt for more information All text above must be
included in any redistribution"


If that's how it's meant I don't know.


I tend to put attributions on physical products anyway. Like on this
http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:167194 Otherwise when is it going to be
read?

Best Regards,

Ben Gray
blog.mearm.io
@MeArmIO <https://twitter.com/MeArmIO>
@phenoptix <https://twitter.com/phenoptix>

On 9 September 2015 at 21:16, Drew Fustini <pdp7pdp7 at gmail.com> wrote:

> oops, adding a Subject:
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Drew Fustini <pdp7pdp7 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I was just reading this thread on the arm-netbook mailing list:
> >
> >   [Arm-netbook] How much to design A20 board?
> >
> http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/pipermail/arm-netbook/2015-September/010660.html
> >
> > and came across this viewpoint:
> >
> >   "attribution clauses require you to advertise *on the product*."
> >
> > I've never considered that before.  Anyone have thoughts about if the
> > physical piece of hardware based on CC-BY-SA designs needs to have
> > attribution inscribed on it?
> >
> > thanks,
> > drew
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.oshwa.org
> http://lists.oshwa.org/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.oshwa.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20150909/7848fb0d/attachment.html>