[Discuss] Attribution on physical hardware?
ben at mearm.io
Wed Sep 9 20:29:26 UTC 2015
I've always taken Adafruit's text as that (for example)
"PCB files for the Adafruit Particle/Spark Neopixel Ring
For more details, check out the product page at
Adafruit invests time and resources providing this open source design,
please support Adafruit and open-source hardware by purchasing products
Designed by Adafruit Industries. Creative Commons Attribution, Share-Alike
license, check license.txt for more information All text above must be
included in any redistribution"
If that's how it's meant I don't know.
I tend to put attributions on physical products anyway. Like on this
http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:167194 Otherwise when is it going to be
On 9 September 2015 at 21:16, Drew Fustini <pdp7pdp7 at gmail.com> wrote:
> oops, adding a Subject:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Drew Fustini <pdp7pdp7 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I was just reading this thread on the arm-netbook mailing list:
> > [Arm-netbook] How much to design A20 board?
> > and came across this viewpoint:
> > "attribution clauses require you to advertise *on the product*."
> > I've never considered that before. Anyone have thoughts about if the
> > physical piece of hardware based on CC-BY-SA designs needs to have
> > attribution inscribed on it?
> > thanks,
> > drew
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.oshwa.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss