[Discuss] Free Hardware
blueback09 at gmail.com
Fri Mar 20 00:39:20 UTC 2015
I think of the "source" in open source hardware as referring to the design.
That's why "free hardware" doesn't make much sense, but "free hardware
designs" does. It's the source/designs that are licensed. The hardware
itself is already free by default.
On Mar 19, 2015 3:27 PM, "Drew Fustini" <pdp7pdp7 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Matt Maier <blueback09 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > It seems unlikely that he'd reach out to the open source hardware
> > because he doesn't think open source hardware is really relevant to what
> > he's doing (free software).
> Yes, I believe rms will never support a definition with the term "Open
> Source", be it in the Software or Hardware context. I think he
> refuses to support anything that does not promote freedom as a matter
> of morality. Open Source takes a more pragmatic approach.
> I do like most of his points after reading his first two essays on
> "Free Hardware". I especially liked how he describes the concept of
> Free Hardware Designs. I sometimes get confused about exactly what we
> are talking about when we talk about hardware licensing. It was a
> good reminder that the discussion is about hardware design files, not
> the hardware itself.
> I think the term Open Source Hardware Design better describes what
> this community (OSHWA) is about, but I don't think it really makes
> practical sense to change it. In regards, to "Free Hardware", I think
> the term Libre Hardware Design is a better description. Just as in
> software, I think Libre/Free and Open Source are different concepts,
> but they both tend to lead to positive outcomes: better technology
> because people are encouraged to build on the work of others.
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.oshwa.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss