[Discuss] New Blog Post Up!

[Mike Eber]

Then there needs to be a standard license or a selection of licenses to use
specified in the OSHW Definition.

It would make things lots easier for newcomers.

-MIke


On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Andrew Back <andrew at carrierdetect.com>wrote:

> On 22 May 2014 18:34, Mike Eber <meber at makertronic.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think the OSHWA need's to come up with it's own OSHW appropriate
> license. It would help a lot of the confusion surrounding OSHW.
> >
> > Some people think it is already a license itself.
>
> I'm not sure that licence confusion warrants proliferation — in fact
> quite the opposite.
>
> Consider first what you seek to achieve that CERN, TAPR and SolderPad
> licences do not allow you to do.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andrew
>
> --
> Andrew Back
> http://carrierdetect.com
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.oshwa.org
> http://lists.oshwa.org/listinfo/discuss
>



-- 

Regards,

Mike Eber


@Makertronic <http://www.twitter.com/Makertronic>
1221 Flower Mound Road, Suite 320-102
Flower Mound,  TX  75028
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.oshwa.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140522/adb6f83e/attachment.html>