[Discuss] New Blog Post Up!
meber at makertronic.com
Thu May 22 17:49:17 UTC 2014
Then there needs to be a standard license or a selection of licenses to use
specified in the OSHW Definition.
It would make things lots easier for newcomers.
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Andrew Back <andrew at carrierdetect.com>wrote:
> On 22 May 2014 18:34, Mike Eber <meber at makertronic.com> wrote:
> > I think the OSHWA need's to come up with it's own OSHW appropriate
> license. It would help a lot of the confusion surrounding OSHW.
> > Some people think it is already a license itself.
> I'm not sure that licence confusion warrants proliferation — in fact
> quite the opposite.
> Consider first what you seek to achieve that CERN, TAPR and SolderPad
> licences do not allow you to do.
> Andrew Back
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.oshwa.org
1221 Flower Mound Road, Suite 320-102
Flower Mound, TX 75028
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss