[Discuss] patent pools for defense of open source contributors

Andrés Delgado andres at delgado.ec
Wed Aug 20 17:26:02 UTC 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

What about
http://defensivepatentlicense.com/

On 20/08/14 12:25, Matt Maier wrote:
> Can we apply this same framework to protect open source hardware? It seems like patents are
even more important to the hardware side of open source, since they're
technically the only thing that speaks to control of the physical items.
> 
> http://archive.oreilly.com/pub/post/patent_pools_offer_open_source.html
> 
> "The two patent pool projects concerned here--open source's shining
knights in armor--are the Patent Commons Project
<http://www.patent-commons.org/> and the Open Invention Network
<http://www.openinventionnetwork.com/>. The basic idea is to use the
patent system the way companies and inventors have used it from the
start: to cross-license patents and use patents defensively so they
aren't sued out of existence"
> 
> Until now, there was no prize for doing open source; you didn't get
back anything in return...Now it's different. Open source your software,
and you get protection. Individual developers or small software houses
that always had to worry about patent lawsuits can now worry a bit
less--but only if they play the open-source game...Managers who always
asked "What do we get for open-sourcing besides good will?" now have a
concrete answer: there will be a lot of legal muscle at their disposal."
> 
> "If large legal resources are available to anyone open-sourcing his or
her software, it suddenly becomes critical to define open source
precisely...Amazingly, I have not been able to find anywhere--on the web
sites of the Patent Commons Project and the Open Invention Network or
among any of the commentators--a definition of open source."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.oshwa.org
> http://lists.oshwa.org/listinfo/discuss

- -- 
Atentamente,

Andrés Delgado
http://andres.delgado.ec
PGP FINGERPRINT
6209 2184 5018 F233 2149 4F8C 9BCC C6B0 82E8 CA26
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT9NoqAAoJEJvMxrCC6MomZhYIALaSqNmwCAA96vBTiJrVh4eX
8CnV5e3ORvzF6OTlCrnTxBX4l4EIxcDOxyBLHfQ/V37F0v4e3nAeC938nwqUyU5n
h02XRpMpjHmej8G3RYAxA2cuH8ErrLHY3cJTQrpyP4CV2s8LoLqxuEkY1TntKViE
BoG++raZ2Ql/oZofEFYZPAwNH8TrrURB6MyqF/JuOy9fP1211opN+oD9k/UPP97o
l98gmW3ouy92IGMvHyT8Nf9SXgdU4/L7svtq+1z9Rna06gISCDasS2lTq0TN3m46
2hsUTwY8sOAWdw4kkNIV7PmAlElky3I05caTBoJqM3dgPLLx+Krx1Wu/DAdwSGs=
=cvJe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the discuss mailing list