[Discuss] Is CC BY-NC-SA not Open Source Hardware?
billy.meinke at gmail.com
Fri Apr 11 17:26:31 UTC 2014
There surely is a spectrum of openness when it comes to copyright, and
the six CC licenses are no exception. It might be good to refer to the
> A piece of data or content is open if anyone is free to use, reuse, and redistribute it — subject only, at most, to the requirement to attribute and/or share-alike.
Of the CC licenses, CC BY and CC BY-SA (share-alike) are the only ones
that would place a piece of content inside of the open definition.
Re: marking, it's always better be clear about which license (not just
an open/CC license) is being applied to the work, in a way that is
human-and-machine readable. Doing any less would lead to further
confusion around reuse rights, for sure.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Mike Dupont
<jamesmikedupont at googlemail.com> wrote:
> according to the recent ruling in germany, NC is only private usage. You
> cannot even use it in public.
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:15 AM, Andrew Back <andrew at carrierdetect.com>
>> On 11 April 2014 09:08, Ben Gray <ben at phenoptix.com> wrote:
>> >I'm of the opinion that it serves best those who don't respect such
>> > licenses and punishes those who do.
>> An excellent point -- NC is something of an "own goal".
>> Andrew Back
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss at lists.oshwa.org
> James Michael DuPont
> Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://www.flossk.org
> Saving Wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com
> Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at lists.oshwa.org
Billy Meinke, MEd
@billymeinke / web
More information about the discuss