[Discuss] [DIYbio] Fwd: The institutionalization of OSHW
kanzure at gmail.com
Sat Sep 29 02:17:53 UTC 2012
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Tim Schmidt <timschmidt at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've previously proposed using and extending, and have used in my own
> projects, Josef Prusa's ThingDoc. Which provides a perfectly workable
> minimum feature set for mapping dependencies, source files, and other
> softwareisms onto this physical world. It even provides for assembly
> steps and such. Is it perfect? Far from it. But the problem you
> mention has been solved. Time to move up to the next layer.
I am looking at the README. It claims only:
* BoM text file
* HTML documentation
* TeX documentation
* Wiki documentation (suitable for the reprap.org wiki)
* Dependency tree in text-mode and using GraphViz
Before I puke over this, can you show me where the documentation is?
is there a spec?
Does the BOM refer to part numbers, or package names, or what?
What is the dependency tree being resolved against?
The README links to a wiki, which 404s.
1 512 203 0507
More information about the discuss